![]() While one senses that functions have been shoehorned into predetermined shapes, the proportions are generous enough that you never quite feel the squeeze, space appearing to expand thanks to the reading room’s soaring volumes and to the generous courtyard, which floods the building with daylight, proving its worth even on the dark fall afternoon I visited. “This change made the project stronger,” says Geers with a smile, “and much more interestingly complex.”Īt once strange and familiar, as though Japanese contractors had built an American round barn and dropped it in Flanders, the completed library exhibits typical OFFICE idiosyncrasies in the use of metal-zinc for the roof, aluminum for doors and external window frames-and in a certain blankness of detailing, which is in fact the product of extreme attention to detail (hats off to the contractor who prefabricated the envelope’s frame with its curved shelves). To achieve this, OFFICE inserted another simple figure-a circle sector, a portion of the disk delimited by two radii-into their plan so that, on the ground floor, it creates a space for the dining hall and, where it intersects with the central square, two triangles, one of which contains staff offices and the other bathrooms and a kitchen. The competition jury was convinced, aside from one practical issue: rather than floating in the middle of the building, the dining room should connect with the perimeter. We imagined ours as the biggest house in the village.” For the latter, the architects chose a classic pitched gable, because, explains Geers, “a public building in a rural context is not the same as in a city, where libraries tend to be transparent glass boxes. Since the building’s raison d’être was books, OFFICE combined shelving and structure, with the envelope’s timber frame carrying both bookshelves (515 feet more than required) and the roof. In this way, open-air reading could occur without building fences, and the grounds outside the library remain entirely accessible for public use. At the center of its 98-foot-diameter circle, OFFICE drew a square, one half of which contained the dining hall, with classrooms above, and the other a courtyard garden. Since there was talk of rebuilding the primary school, OFFICE made its building a cloistered, autonomous object, circular and compact, with “no front or back or any kind of clear orientation,” as Anne van Hout, the project architect, explains. In 2017, the firm returned to this motif, albeit at a far more modest scale, when competing to build the village library at Sint-Martens-Latem in Flanders. ![]() ![]() An inversion of the classic motif of a circle inside a square-found, for example, in Palladio’s Villa La Rotunda, Hardouin-Mansart’s Dôme des Invalides, or Louis Kahn’s National Assembly of Bangladesh-this combination first entered OFFICE’s repertoire in its 2006 competition proposal for an annex to Gunnar Asplund’s Stockholm Public Library: in response to the Swede’s Palladian drum-on-a-box, OFFICE imagined a cylinder enclosing a square courtyard. A figure that simple cannot settle all the issues.’ And when we win, they say, ‘This is weird-you wouldn’t think a figure that simple could resolve all the problems!’” Among the basic shapes OFFICE uses to compose its plans, quadrilaterals loom large, but circles also appear from time to time, often enclosing a square. ![]() “When we lose, the judges say, ‘We don’t trust you. “Our buildings tend to appear very simple, which is both a winning and a losing factor in competitions,” laughs architect Kersten Geers, founding partner, alongside David Van Severen, of Brussels-based OFFICE KGDVS, a 2009 RECORD Design Vanguard.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |